4 ms·
I think the flex here is photographic quality images from a video camera. 6000 pixels across is a higher resolution than the top digital cameras from a few year
by michrassena 6y ago
I think the flex here is photographic quality images from a video camera. 6000 pixels across is a higher resolution than the top digital cameras from a few years ago. Combine that with an easy way to extract hundreds of frames which can be stacked and you have a relatively simple way to create these deep macro photos. Similar techniques (e.g. lucky imaging) have been used for years by astro-photographers even in the days of 320x240 webcams.
- numpad0 6y agoIt’s a mirrorless with 24MP APS-C sensor. Top mirrorless from a decade ago already had 24MP APS-C sensors. Top smartphone from a decade ago had better resolution(41MP). I’m not saying the camera can’t be impressive, I’m saying you’re vomiting marketing script.
- michrassena 6y agoI'm not doing anyone's vomiting for them. I'm not in the target market here. There's no way I'm dropping $2000 on a camera that shoots only video. As far as marketing goes, 41MP of noisy pixels from a 1/1.2" 2012-vintage sensor is not comparable to 24MP from today's APS-C sensors. Here's an image sample linked from a DPReview article from 2013 to get my point across. https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/7739037780/nokia-lumia-1020-pro-highres-17.jpg https://www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/7739037780/nokia-l... From this article: https://www.dpreview.com/news/7739037780/nokia-image-samples-lumia1020 https://www.dpreview.com/news/7739037780/nokia-image-samples...