4 ms·
I think you underestimate the efficacy and resourcefulness of the private enterprise. People are usually rewarded (a lot) when they find new markets, and in the
by runarberg 6y ago
I think you underestimate the efficacy and resourcefulness of the private enterprise. People are usually rewarded (a lot) when they find new markets, and in the modern economy, they do. There is no reason to expect they would stop doing that if we would abolish the stock market.
I’m sure that the majority of all businesses are able to fund their own ventures (including solar panel manufacturers), if they don’t have the savings, there are also loans, government (and community) support, etc. I think your overestimate of the value (or rather the necessity) of the stock market stems from big, expensive, and risky ventures. Perhaps you are right and those would suffer if the stock market would suddenly collapse on it self.
However like I said previously, I think you underestimate the resourcefulness of the private enterprise. In a world where there are no stocks, and a company wants to venture in a risky and expensive project, that nobody wants to loan for (not even the government) perhaps they would find a way to scale down the project, start earning profits (or demonstrate how the profits will come as the project is scaled up). Perhaps some loan agency will specialize in large risky loans (at a higher price), and perhaps we will (god forbids) re-invent the stock market.
If I am wrong and I overestimate the resourcefulness of the private enterprise. Then the government can always kick in and fund the deployment of those solar panels. After all we do need them, and there is no risk for the government (well the risk is the other direction of letting those solar panels go undeployed and risk a runaway climate disaster; hence the green new deal).
- dragontamer 6y agoThe biggest private enterprises I'm aware of are Cargill and Koch, at estimated $115 Billion revenue each. Lets just look at the top companies in the world by revenue, shall we? 1. Walmart (Public, stock ticker WMT) -- 560 Billion/year revenue 2. Amazon (Public, AMZN) -- 386 Billion 3. Apple (Public, AAPL) -- 274 Billion 4. CVS (Public, CVS) -- 268 Billion 5. ExxonMobil (Public XOM) -- 264 Billion (Etc. etc. etc.) By revenue, we have to drop down all the way to #25: Bank of America ($113 Billion/year) before we find public companies close to the size of private ones. ---------- In fact, most private companies seek to go public. So that those private-shares can be "Cashed out" on the public market. Private companies do not have access to a market: you cannot leave your seat of ownership very easily. In contrast: public companies trade their ownership ("shares") millions of times a day on the public stock market. Its extremely easy to become an owner... or to leave your seat of power. As such, as large private companies's owners grow old (and eventually die), their successors naturally transition to public ownership models. As such, figures such as Bill Gates, can easily leave their seat as owner of Microsoft and move on with their life, doing something else. All Bill Gates had to do was sell his shares.