I think if you got the trademark it would mean something but it sounds like in many cases you don't. For instance, if I could buy an asset with a smart contrac

I think if you got the trademark it would mean something but it sounds like in many cases you don't. For instance, if I could buy an asset with a smart contract that pays the artist when I lease the trademark, that would be 1 thing. But I'm not even sure our law is up to date here since if I owned the trademark I could go outside the smart contract. Maybe we need new law which allows a party to create and sell trademark rights to an asset with an associated smart contract that grants the creator funds when the trademark is used?