5 ms·
You know what, you're right. I thought there was an "unwrap", that's my b
by jedimastert 6y ago
You know what, you're right. I thought there was an "unwrap", that's my b
- shakow 6y agoNo problem, knowledge comes from suffering ;)
- resonantjacket5 6y agoYou can technically wrap the promise and spin lock on it till it resolves. Aka forcibly wait on an async function in a sync function. There are some npm libraries that provide it. I've used a couple times (for some hacky scripts), though obviously don't use it in the browser.
- pitaj 6y agoAFAIK, you can't do this from JS, you have to have some engine integration, as the busy loop in JS will prevent the event loop from working. For instance, this will essentially halt your runtime: let y; Promise.resolve(123).then(x => { y = x; }); while (!y) {} console.log(y)
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- lhorie 6y agoYes, deasync[0] for example, hooks into the Node.js event loop from c++ land [0] https://www.npmjs.com/package/deasync https://www.npmjs.com/package/deasync