3 ms·
Actually part of the genome of RaTG13 was published as RaBtCoV/4991 back in 2016. Some people suspected it [0] and eventually Dr. Shi confirmed it [1] after.
by Uberphallus 6y ago
Actually part of the genome of RaTG13 was published as RaBtCoV/4991 back in 2016.
Some people suspected it [0] and eventually Dr. Shi confirmed it [1] after.
[0] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341547726_Understanding_the_Origin_of_%27BatCoVRaTG13%27_a_Virus_Closest_to_SARS-CoV-2 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341547726_Understan...
[1] https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6503/487.full https://science.sciencemag.org/content/369/6503/487.full
- trevelyan 6y agoThank you for the reference. [1] particularly interesting.