Oh come on~ This is classic someone-else’s-problem thinking: if you create waste that will exist in a highly toxic form for thousands of years, where radioacti

Oh come on~ This is classic someone-else’s-problem thinking: if you create waste that will exist in a highly toxic form for thousands of years, where radioactive containment is necessary... Then the cost of that waste is effort to store * life time. Botox is an organic compound that can be disposed of after treating with simple chemicals, and decomposes naturally after a trivial amount of time. You know what the recommended cleaning instructions for a Botox spill are? Spray the surface with sodium hypochlorite and then spray it down after 30 minutes. So. Tell me again how Botox is worse than nuclear waste? Remind me how “Phrases like "most toxic substance" or "perpetual risks" doesn't mean much...?” This is complete BS, and it is the problem with the pro-nuclear sentiment: waving your hands and talking BS doesn’t make the problems disappear. Wanting nuclear waste and nuclear accidents not to be a thing doesn’t make them not be a thing. Wanting something to be true and it actually being true. Are. Not. The. Same. Thing. So... there’s plenty of good stuff about nuclear, but taking about it like this isn’t helping.