I assume you’re referring to this part: > This last point is contentious but make no mistake: PEDs are ahead of detection capabilities. I think that at this po

I assume you’re referring to this part: > This last point is contentious but make no mistake: PEDs are ahead of detection capabilities. I think that at this point any elite athlete _not_ on PEDs is doomed to fall behind. If you’re looking for links out of curiosity, below is a quote from an article where athletes were stripped of medals in 2016 for 2008 and 2012 Olympic Games. “The IOC, which stores samples for 10 years, reanalyzed more than 1,000 samples from the 2008 Beijing Games and 2012 London Olympics with improved techniques that can detect the use of steroids going back weeks and months, rather than days.” [0] Wikipedia has an entry [1] on stripped Olympic medals with references to the announcements. If you’re looking to refute that statement, I can offer up an anecdote in support of the statement from a panel discussion with the former head of WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) I attended during the 2010 Winter Olympics [2]. Playing baseball in my youth we had coaches who played division 1 college baseball. The phrase we were told between the ages of 14-16 was, “if you’re not cheating, you’re not competing”. That’s the college baseball wisdom that was brought back to Canada. It’s not hard for me to imagine how that can move on to taking PEDs. [0] https://www.cbc.ca/sports/olympics/olympic-medals-stripped-doping-retests-1.3868113 https://www.cbc.ca/sports/olympics/olympic-medals-stripped-d... [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stripped_Olympic_medals https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stripped_Olympic_med... [2] https://chancentre.com/events/sport-society-sport-ethics-technology-with-richard-pound-and-guests/ https://chancentre.com/events/sport-society-sport-ethics-tec...