1. Nothing about it strikes me as dishonest. 2. Trying to understand (as in make space for) misapprehensions in the general public isn’t a matter of honesty it

1. Nothing about it strikes me as dishonest. 2. Trying to understand (as in make space for) misapprehensions in the general public isn’t a matter of honesty it’s a matter of affordance. 3. The “opinion”, which is based in scientific fact, isn’t that we should “throw away” anything, but that we should use the abstraction where it’s useful without imposing it where it’s not: and especially where harmful. 4. Everything is a statistical anomaly that isn’t universal. Using that to dismiss the people who experience it is dehumanizing. 5. It’s not especially anomalous. The most recognizable anomalies are further from the most recognizable common cases, but the common cases are on a spectrum as well. 6. Your numbers are off by a couple orders of magnitude but those hundred exceptions matter to those humans.