The real interesting NFTs are those that don't even try and pretend to have a claim to a real-world item. For example, you can currently buy an NFT for a destro

The real interesting NFTs are those that don't even try and pretend to have a claim to a real-world item. For example, you can currently buy an NFT for a destroyed Banksy piece (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/banksy-nft-injective-destroy-art-digital-token/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/banksy-nft-injective-destroy-ar...). I mean if this isn't evidence of a cryptomania I don't know what is. I think the most saddening part is that almost everyone pushing NFTs are pushing a get-rich-quick scheme, and trying to get as many un- or misinformed people in on the scam as possible. Lately I've seen relatives buying art NFTs thinking that they get some kind of ownership in a piece of digital artwork (and no, they don't get the copyright. That stays with the artist.) Honestly, once Jack Dorsey sells his first tweet, he just sell it again. What's stopping him? He got 2.5MM for it one time and gets to keep ownership. Why not just keep selling an NFT to the fabled First Tweet and rake in the cash. This is clearly an irrational market and seeing how crazy it can get would be amazing.