Of course there are more details and costs. Question is whether those lamenting the abuse by profiteers are willing to solve the problems (as they lament) by pu

Of course there are more details and costs. Question is whether those lamenting the abuse by profiteers are willing to solve the problems (as they lament) by purchasing & developing a comparable & competitive property just 1.75 miles away ... or, by failing to, demonstrate that at least the abusing profiteers are in fact providing a competitive service vs merely lamenting. Your reasonable complaints do raise the point that zoning laws drive the cost of housing out of reach of the poor. Having infrastructure beyond mere sewage, electric, and a gravel road is of course desirable, yet what is gained if residents can’t afford it? At what point, and how, does reality collide with objective costs of good intentions? And yes, 150 acres divided by 600 lots is 0.25 acres per lot - plenty of room for a single-wide and share of infrastructure.