2 ms·
You seem to be in agreement with the article and my top-level comment, since you aren't using the Object/Relational Mapping part of your favorite ORM. It is not
by geophile 6y ago
You seem to be in agreement with the article and my top-level comment, since you aren't using the Object/Relational Mapping part of your favorite ORM. It is not surprising that the ORM/SQL dichotomy is exaggerated if you ignore the ORM.
- stickfigure 6y agoI make queries in SQL and those queries are mapped to objects. Sounds like ORM to me. Furthermore, those objects are "live" and editing them updates the database. Navigating the object graph navigates the database. All this is very convenient. When it's not convenient or performant, I write updates or tuple queries by hand. But mostly the approach of "select entities using complex SQL queries but use the ORM approach afterward" is a sweet spot.