2 ms·
null not as an act, but as the absence of act :) (the analogy is lacking, I know).
by BasDirks 15y ago
null not as an act, but as the absence of act :) (the analogy is lacking, I know).
- joshcorbin 15y agoThat's actually what I'm speaking to. The Mahayana tradition (in particular Zen) is the one that focuses more on not doing; where-as Theravada very much puts forth the practice as an act of doing. The usual language is to "turn towards" what is happening, not to simply "be one" with it.