3 ms·
I appreciate some of the rationale for the cost, however the fridge itself is less than five years old. The solution here would be standardised fridge door she
by detritus 6y ago
I appreciate some of the rationale for the cost, however the fridge itself is less than five years old.
The solution here would be standardised fridge door shelf types, or better yet - sturdier designs that don't gradually crack when the door is shut 'a little jovially', billiarding glass jars around... .
- bluGill 6y agoStandardization is nice in theory, but I'm not sure if it is practical - designers like to make silly little changes for branding reasons all the time. Which is why your 5 year old shelf is probably out of production anyway. As for sturdier designs: that is a design feature you need to be willing to pay for. Make sure you check on that in the next fridge and tell others. (Price is not a guide to quality - often but not always cheaper fridges are bought by those who buy enough to care about value and quality is a part of value, while the more expensive ones are targeted at people who buy fancy features and don't know to think about quality - but this is a maybe not a guide)
- detritus 6y agoFor sure, but if there were an ISO standard for fridge doors, I could at least get options that perhaps whilst not exactly the same as what I have aesthetically, would fit functionally. As an ex/sometime-designer myself, I can appreciate why they'd want to make silly little changes ;) And yes, as I admitted in my first post here - it IS a crappy fridge. I have only myself to blame.