3 ms·
> because I don't want my taxpayer money to be wasted on any more nuclear boondoggles. What's your opinion of mask refusers? How about people who don't actual
by Rule35 6y ago
> because I don't want my taxpayer money to be wasted on any more nuclear boondoggles.
What's your opinion of mask refusers?
How about people who don't actually refuse to wear a mask but who just sabotage all societal effort to encourage mask wearing?
> Most countries don't have large uranium deposits either. Importation and exportation solves such problems.
It's easier to import a few tons of Uranium fuel pellets every year than to export terawatts of energy.
I wish we'd just bill fossil fuel plants for their pollution. We'd quickly need new alternatives and instead of us simply telling you that renewables won't work as foreseen you could just run into the problem yourself.
- Rule35 6y agoI want to add that I and most pro-Nuke people I know also want renewables. In good wind places, wind is a huge win. In good solar places, solar is a huge win. A healthy grid definitely takes advantage of cheap renewables and ideally peakable businesses develop to more effectively utilize variable power. We just don't think it's appropriate for everything. To have a 100% renewable grid requires renewables where they aren't a win and tons of storage, and there's a cost to all of this. Renewable isn't free or even non-polluting, it merely means limitless which nuclear effectively is as well.