4 ms·
You are citing a study that isn't peer reviewed as a "data point" but when you summarize it like that looks like a factual claim when no factual conclusion shou
by anotherman554 6y ago
You are citing a study that isn't peer reviewed as a "data point" but when you summarize it like that looks like a factual claim when no factual conclusion should be drawn.
It would be an interesting data point if there was any particularly reason to believe the document you cited would hold up to further study.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- subtypefiddler 6y ago> study that isn't peer reviewed Terrier, C., 2020. Boys lag behind: How teachers’ gender biases affect student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 77, p.101981. "Economics of Education Review is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal covering education economics. It was established in 1981 and is published by Elsevier." What are you talking about?
- anotherman554 6y agoThe link I followed upthread was to a working paper from 2016, not a journal article published in 2020.