25 ms·
The problem with this argument is that Washington Post could be 100% objective and your argument would remain the same. I'm not sure there was anything they cou
by setr 6y ago
The problem with this argument is that Washington Post could be 100% objective and your argument would remain the same. I'm not sure there was anything they could that would alleviate your concern, except removing bezos as owner altogether -- because anything they do could potentially benefit bezos (partly because he got some kind of relationship to pretty much everything at this point)
- pydry 6y agoMentioning the traffic lights story would have alleviated my concern. I didn't expect it to be included and I wasn't surprised that it wasn't. https://www.rt.com/usa/515972-amazon-alabama-traffic-light-union/ https://www.rt.com/usa/515972-amazon-alabama-traffic-light-u... (there are plenty of non RT sources for this but the feeling you get when you see me using RT as a source neatly illustrates my point) You're right in a sense. I wouldn't trust North Koreans to report on themselves and I wouldn't trust Amazon to do it either, pretty much no matter what they said.