4 ms·
That's fine. Just charge the fake reviewers and fake review companies with FCC violations, and remove their reviews. Have them hand over their books for lighter
by asdfasgasdgasdg 6y ago
That's fine. Just charge the fake reviewers and fake review companies with FCC violations, and remove their reviews. Have them hand over their books for lighter penalties, then hit the companies buying fake reviews with enforcement orders as well.
Of course, all this is complicated by the fact that most of these companies are probably overseas . . .
- kofejnik 6y agodon't think FCC will prosecute bodyshops in India and Phillippines
- asdfasgasdgasdg 6y agoI wonder the extent to which it's possible for such body shops to get accounts that are believed by Google to live in the U.S. (or fake-review destination country of choice). I see sites that purport to offer such accounts for 30-50 cents per account. So I guess it's not that expensive. I wonder how often these accounts get burned and how much revenue they generate with each account beforehand.
- RileyJames 6y agoThat’s exactly what services like luminati.io (holavpn) are used for. While accounts can be purchased, they then need to remain tied to a US IP address to avoid being restricted. There are some legitimate uses to proxy through residential IPs, but I wonder what percentage of traffic through luminati is legitimate. Wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a single digit percentage.
- sneak 6y ago> Just charge the fake reviewers and fake review companies with FCC violations, and remove their reviews. Then, as a sibling comment pointed out, you just pay to get obviously fake mass positive reviews for a competitor, and suddenly they have a null rating because the market has removed all the reviews.