38 ms·
Yep - we needed the distinction for a scheduling/rota app. Some users had shifts that started at 24:00 and then ended sometime during the night. Other users ha
by pistolpeteDK 6y ago
Yep - we needed the distinction for a scheduling/rota app.
Some users had shifts that started at 24:00 and then ended sometime during the night. Other users had shifts that ended at 24:00.
I know that it's common to use 23:59 in the latter case, but IMO that's just a poor workaround; and I'd argue that 16:00 -> 00:00 is a lot less obvious than 16:00 -> 24:00.
As for a shift that starts friday 24:00, you could argue that the shift is actually a 'Saturday 00:00 shift', but the users didn't see it that way; they are scheduling Friday nights shifts and want an extra person late Friday evening.
- jcrawfordor 6y agoWhen I used to work in a 24/7 environment I would quip that "it's not tomorrow until the morning crew takes over." In a lot of practical situations I think it's easier for people to think about the early morning hours as being late the previous day. It tends to match shifts and reporting cycles better.
- Aloha 6y agoIt's not really morning until the sun comes up ;-)
- soneil 6y agoIt's not tomorrow until I've been to sleep. It's not the morning until I've had a cup of coffee. Time is incredibly subjective. Clocks need to agree, but nomenclature does not.
- EvanAnderson 6y agoI had a software project where I thought I could infer which shift was working from the time (because shift-related metrics were really important). I learned very quickly that shift and time, though related, are really separate data points.