3 ms·
>Having Babies. Really, being a mother is what skews most stats about women on money issues. There has been policymaking about this in a bunch of european count
by wing-_-nuts 6y ago
>Having Babies. Really, being a mother is what skews most stats about women on money issues.
There has been policymaking about this in a bunch of european countries, and if they are released from financial constrains (handouts, public housing, whatever) they seem to double down on it.
Curious as to what you mean by 'doubling down on it'?
You're not wrong in your statement that having kids kills the career of many women. The question is, why? The drive to reproduce is probably our second strongest in the human species, right after survival. Why, then, is it not easier to have kids and a career? It's about as universal a value as we have. Why is it not more supported? Why don't we have any guaranteed child leave in the US? Why don't we have universal daycare / preK?
I say all this as a guy who doesn't even want kids, but I do think it would be better for society if there was more support for parents, even if I paid more taxes to pay for it.
- chlodwig 6y agoWhy don't we have universal daycare / preK? How about increasing the tax credit that goes to all parent, regardless of they choose to do childcare? Maybe for some parents that would be enough that one parent could quit their job and finally have the joy of spending more of their time with their own kid. I don't see why we should subsidize institutional childcare over other forms of caring for the very young.
- dec0dedab0de 6y agoas a parent I think parents should have to pay more taxes, and it should go up per child.
- wing-_-nuts 6y agoIf this is based off of environmental concerns, I'd much rather we implement a carbon tax. Target the thing you wish to reduce.