4 ms·

Why is there no https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_BMW https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_BMW ? Or https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism

• Daho0n 6y ago
  Because you are too lazy to start them.
• sundaeofshock 6y ago
  Because their CEOs are not messianic figures with a legion of on-line fans who will rush to their defense at the first hint of criticism.
  • throwaway0a5e 6y ago
    >legion of on-line fans who will rush to their defense at the first hint of criticism. Toyota has this. Though to be clear they defend the brand itself. The CEO doesn't have any special personal following like Elon does.
  • teruakohatu 6y ago
    Don't you mean because their stock is not heavily shorted and so not shouting about every misaligned door panel might cost some funds a lot of money? Edit: looking at the edits, but the person's who has done a lot or most of the recent edits has the word "stonk" in their username.
• enjoyyourlife 6y ago
  Because it wants to be treated as a tech company
• dvfjsdhgfv 6y ago
  It's a purely technical issue. Once the criticism section grows, it makes more sense to create a separate article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Microsoft In some cases, the Criticism article is longer than the one about the company itself.
• JdeBP 6y ago
  Because it's acknowledged to be a poor idea and poor writing to habitually structure articles this way. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criticism#Separate_articles_devoted_to_criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criticism#Separate_a... * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking#Point_of_view_(POV)_forks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking#Poin...