3 ms·
Both the book, the blog post, and this HN submission are deeply wrong on one thing: it should be called "software architecture", instead of simply "architecture
by simonebrunozzi 6y ago
Both the book, the blog post, and this HN submission are deeply wrong on one thing: it should be called "software architecture", instead of simply "architecture".
You might say: the audience would think of software, it's unnecessary to specify... Perhaps you're right. I still think that a distinction would serve us well.
- gegtik 6y agoI personally disagree. The title is succinct and well understood by people in this domain.
- OgAstorga 6y agoI’m a software engineer with 10+ years of working experience. Currently working at FANG. When I see the word architect I think about architecture. Not software architecture.
- gegtik 6y agoImmutable is another common software domain word. An article posted to yCombinator's "Hacker News" titled "Immutable Architecture" could refer to edifaces that don't change (?) but I was not surprised to discover that it refers to software architecture.
- xbar 6y agoI think you are right.
- jcims 6y agoIt'd be fine if 'immutable' wasn't also very commonly used in the directly adjacent domains of systems and security architecture.
- manojlds 6y agoI see roles like Evangelist and Tech Evangelists. Even Tech is not about Software (one of the coolest techs people talked about in 2020 is mRNA) Hope those get explicitly named as well.
- nautilus12 6y agoimplicit val industry: IndustryType = IndustryType.Software
- veltas 6y agoI also thought it meant other architecture.
- iou 6y agoSorry, I just copied the title of the website. I'm not sure how to update this post.
- iou 6y agoI'd listened to the podcast about it on software engineering radio and thought it has some interesting concepts.