Thanks, I think I might be gradually understanding more of what you're saying. I feel like I've often heard the paradox of tolerance invoked in regard to what

Thanks, I think I might be gradually understanding more of what you're saying. I feel like I've often heard the paradox of tolerance invoked in regard to what U.S. free expression law would call "pure speech", but it seems like your point is more along the lines that there's no group or society that would literally do nothing at all to defend itself in any circumstances, and that that's an unachievable or unsustainable extreme. Maybe something like the most extreme form of pacificism, where people imply that they will literally allow themselves to be killed without trying to prevent it in any way.