Nah you're right. No burden on you. I'm just saying logically, if he makes that claim and you know he's not an idiot and a lot of people vote him up, then there

Nah you're right. No burden on you. I'm just saying logically, if he makes that claim and you know he's not an idiot and a lot of people vote him up, then there must be a compelling reason for why he made the claim. The reasoning has the potential to change the way you think about his claim or it has the potential to be completely wrong. But the context of the situation makes it so that you cannot ignore the potential.