>diversion -- (the scenarios are off track, but saying so advances the agenda of those opposed to action) and, It is probably worthwhile to note: while the abo

>diversion -- (the scenarios are off track, but saying so advances the agenda of those opposed to action) and, It is probably worthwhile to note: while the above might actually be a defensive response to these data, the argument is not necessarily valid -- the fact that emissions have been overestimated does not necessarily weaken the case for action. In particular, changes in temperature and precipitation continue to be observed even consistent with "wrong" models[1], and as such the sensitivity of the climate to these lower levels of emissions is not "good news". 1: https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-models-are-getting-future-warming-projections-right/ https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-mo...