4 ms·
Google certainly has more monetary resources. But in my experience large companies like Google are the ones that can't afford to do something like this. The log
by manfredo 6y ago
Google certainly has more monetary resources. But in my experience large companies like Google are the ones that can't afford to do something like this. The logistical benefits of white-boarding interviews and the accountability gains are much more important to large companies. This interview process was for a smaller company.
But you're absolutely correct that the more time-consuming the interview process is for the candidate, the more likely they'll interview somewhere else. In fact, that's exactly what I did: I received an offer partway through this git-based interview process, and the offer was good enough that I didn't see value in completing it.
- flukus 6y agoGoogle is a large well known and well paying company that can get candidates to make that sort of time investment, smaller companies can't because they're just generic companies that no one particular wants to work for, I'll skip the elaborate test and apply for the next generic company in the list. Aside from that, I really don't have time for these elaborate interviews if I'm already in a job, companies that do this are limiting their potential candidates to the unemployed.
- 908B64B197 6y ago> companies that do this are limiting their potential candidates to the unemployed. And sometimes there's a reason folks are unemployed...
- mechEpleb 6y agoYes, usually that reason is that once you are unemployed you fall to the bottom of any hiring manager's list of eligible applicants.