4 ms·
It already is – in national constitutions, and both the EU and UN definitions of human rights. The issue is with enforcement. Lots of today's data collection,
by eivarv 6y ago
It already is – in national constitutions, and both the EU and UN definitions of human rights.
The issue is with enforcement.
Lots of today's data collection, sale and use is illegal (often patently so).
- fsenart 6y agoSo what is the solution? In the absence of effective enforcement, do we have to resign ourselves? Or can we force the industry and its practices to change?
- eivarv 6y agoWe can use tools that protect us (secure software, anti-tracking software...) and educate practitioners about privacy enhancing technologies and privacy engineering in general. But there isn't any technological solution to the arms-race of offense and defense. We need strong regulation, and effective enforcement as well.
- fsenart 6y agoIt seems a pretty sad world to me. The sole fact that we are talking about offense and defense is harsh. An individual needs his fundamental rights to be respected, and at the same time, a service provider needs data to pursue improve his product. We should consider both to hope for a balance. IMHO, the problem with today's solutions is that the individual is set out of the equation because data are "considered" anonymous. We take for granted something that may at least deserve more attention. By promoting consent as a first-class citizen, we can reposition the individual at the center again.