3 ms·
> It’s obvious MS and any other company that compensates similarly is included when stating “FAANG” Then why is faang.io using a strict definition of FAANG? I
by izolate 6y ago
> It’s obvious MS and any other company that compensates similarly is included when stating “FAANG”
Then why is faang.io using a strict definition of FAANG? I think a loose definition is preferable, but clearly that's not a universally-held opinion.
- lotsofpulp 6y agoThat is a good point, I guess I'm just used to seeing it in discussions where the context is distinguishing companies with high pay and valuable RSUs versus others.