Just because you don't like a piece of writing does not mean the writing is bad. > I have so many questions. > Is the person a writer for New Yorker? Is The Dr

Just because you don't like a piece of writing does not mean the writing is bad. > I have so many questions. > Is the person a writer for New Yorker? Is The Drunken Canal somehow related to the New Yorker? What is The Drunken Canal? How was she “regretting” something at that point in time? Vocally or otherwise? What publication was being stored in those unmarked white newspaper boxes? Wait, is The Drunken Canal a publication? > Something like this would be more clear: It's also more boring. There are people who like things to be a bit more entangled, as real life often is, and that's what that writing caters for. -- People like this guy who seem to be believe there's only one correct way to write, who actually believe you can put writing that is supposed to be pushing the envelope into "an app that identifies poor writing" and use the results piss me off. Grammarly and similar have their uses of course, but I dread the day people actually use it to clamp down on anything that's slightly different than the norm (as this guy is doing), and everyone will be forced to write in a style that conforms with what an ML model says is okay. It is my personal nightmare.