3 ms·
I don't disregard science, nor practice any of that nonsense. I believe in science fully. Trying to attach me to those anti-scientific ideas is kind of asinine.
by John23832 6y ago
I don't disregard science, nor practice any of that nonsense. I believe in science fully. Trying to attach me to those anti-scientific ideas is kind of asinine.
I doubt you actually read what Damore wrote, you just agree with his idea. None of what Damore pushed was any more scientific in nature than phrenology. Take a look for yourself:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-Ideological-Echo-Chamber.pdf https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3914586/Googles-I...
Whenever he points to a biological origin, it's followed by a single study that doesn't come to the point that he's trying to make. It's a lot of "men are this, and women are that" with no substance behind it. If you're google, you can follow the short links, but most are dead.
- alisonkisk 6y agoYour holding Damore to a far higher standard than th non-reproducible psych studies he was responding to, which were endorsed by the paid staff of a multi billion dollar corporation.
- John23832 6y agoThe are no "non-reproducible psych studies". There is Google taking an approach to diversity and inclusion that they see fit, and then there's Damore vocally disagreeing and making an argument backed by pseudoscience.