3 ms·
If they didn't they couldn't have used it and they wouldn't have needed a citation either. The point is that the "because the investigators were unable to cite
by kgwgk 6y ago
If they didn't they couldn't have used it and they wouldn't have needed a citation either.
The point is that the "because the investigators were unable to cite an unpublished work, I submitted it for publication at their request" justification doesn't make much sense. She could have just explained to them that no citation was needed for something so trivial.
- curryst 6y ago> The point is that the "because the investigators were unable to cite an unpublished work, I submitted it for publication at their request" justification doesn't make much sense. She could have just explained to them that no citation was needed for something so trivial. I can see how if you were unaware, and several colleagues in your field were unaware, it might be good to include some kind of external information about the thing. I can also see why you might not want to link to Wikipedia. I do think writing a medical article about it for people to link to is silly. Surely if you wanted a citation, you could just cite a math textbook.