> Choosing to forego generics and do everything with a comptime abstraction makes Zig a lot easier to understand, compared to Rust generics and traits. The down

> Choosing to forego generics and do everything with a comptime abstraction makes Zig a lot easier to understand, compared to Rust generics and traits. The downside is that documentation and predictability suffers. If I understand correctly it also means that Zig will never support inference of generic type parameters. Not a dealbreaker, but unfortunate. I also wonder how relying on comptime for all these things will affect IDE support. I guess the IDE will need to run these comptime computations a lot.