3 ms·
This post overlooks that language adoption is something that happens over decades. It's much too early to conclude anything about Julia adoption. I also think
by bachmeier 6y ago
This post overlooks that language adoption is something that happens over decades. It's much too early to conclude anything about Julia adoption.
I also think there's way too much focus in the post about Julia taking share away from Python or R. The real market is Matlab programmers, for one and only one reason - Matlab is extremely expensive.
A number of years ago I was talking with a vice president of one of the Federal Reserve banks that told me one of their priorities was to move away from Matlab due to the high and growing licensing costs. The New York Fed has in fact moved much of its code from Matlab to Julia: http://frbny-dsge.github.io/DSGE.jl/latest/ http://frbny-dsge.github.io/DSGE.jl/latest/ Julia has momentum in parts of economics that have traditionally been heavy users of Matlab: https://quantecon.org/ https://quantecon.org/
- higerordermap 6y agoThis is interesting. Glad to see matlab being phased out.
- xtracto 6y ago> This post overlooks that language adoption is something that happens over decades. It's much too early to conclude anything about Julia adoption. Spot on, I was doing R back in 2005, when it was slowly become more famous. R fist official release was in 1995. Which means that it took R 26 years to get to the point where it is now. If Julia was launched on 2012, its tipping point may come 20 years later, around 2030.
- bachmeier 6y agoR is one of the languages I was thinking about, but even 1995 understates how long it took. R is an open source implementation of the S language that dates back to 1976.