2 ms·
First, non-rented months _really_ should count; as zero for that time. Second, it sounds like they're over-leveraged.
by mjevans 6y ago
First, non-rented months _really_ should count; as zero for that time.
Second, it sounds like they're over-leveraged.
- Arnt 6y agoIf you assume that the landlord prefers to do repairs/maintenance/improvement between tenants and that that's the most common reason to not let out a property, then not counting that time makes sense. I'm not at all surprised if some landlords are over-leveraged, particularly not now. A lot of people have bled money in the past year.