There is only one place in that article where an actual course of action is discussed, and this is it. > That has her less focused on moderation policies and m

There is only one place in that article where an actual course of action is discussed, and this is it. > That has her less focused on moderation policies and more on actually educating young people because they're going to be the ones who have to fix this mess. So no to censorship, yes to educating the public. Nowhere do they advocate any form of censorship, and they even argue against moderation. So where exactly did you get that opinion from if it’s not actually in the article?