>English doesn't by default fill the space of words that are shorthands for domain specific ideas. That was a rhetorical question. I beg to differ. English doe

>English doesn't by default fill the space of words that are shorthands for domain specific ideas. That was a rhetorical question. I beg to differ. English does fill the space of all kinds of of domain specific areas. Practitioners may invent new vocabulary to use within the English language but in the end they are still using English. In fact even when you talk about "Design patterns" You are still using "English" it's inescapable. I'm saying the extra layer of "design patterns" as a "field" is not necessary. No other "domain" is snobbish enough to call their techniques "patterns" and group them as "design patterns" and fill the field with all this jargon like "strategy pattern." It's just programming techniques, carpentry techniques and the like.