3 ms·
It's disturbing to me that people think population must keep growing. If anything the world could stand to LOSE a significant portion of the population. Resourc
by ziml77 6y ago
It's disturbing to me that people think population must keep growing. If anything the world could stand to LOSE a significant portion of the population. Resources would be far less strained.
If we built our economies on the expectation of continued population growth, then that just means there was a MASSIVE lack of forethought. But that doesn't mean the solution is to start pumping out more kids. Instead we adapt how these structures work to accommodate the flat or lessened population numbers.
- astrange 6y agoThis policy is called degrowth (or ecofascism) and it's not true. Resources were used far more inefficiently and many of them were used more in absolute terms when the population was smaller. It's even possible that we need this many people to do the scientific research needed to use things more efficiently. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-10-23/economic-growth-shouldn-t-be-a-death-sentence-for-earth?sref=3v1e8Etv https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-10-23/econom...
- minkowski 6y agoIdentifying degrowth with ecofascism isn't accurate.
- Ekaros 6y agoSpecially when it's clearly not true. Just look at population not in work in western countries, even outside the current pandemic situation. If we really needed more people wouldn't we have near full employment? Economy will adapt to less demand, though there will be likely pains, but money is just numbers anyway...