3 ms·
With the help of Algolia's HN search, I was able to find the story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21671579 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21671579
by jcrites 6y ago
With the help of Algolia's HN search, I was able to find the story:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21671579 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21671579
Apparently an organization called Shadowserver (a nonprofit security organization) claimed that the blog was part of the control system for a botnet, and the domain was transferred out of the registrant's control with no due process. They got it back, but the fact that such a thing is even possible in the first place was infuriating to me. I don't know if this is a decision that the .in TLD makes, to place trust in groups like Shadowserver (one could argue it's India's TLD and their country gets to run it how they want) but I hope to god that these kinds of "no due process" seizures are not possible with other TLDs like .com. and .dev.
Domain names ought to be property, and like any other property should be protected against arbitrary seizure by courts of law. I understand it's important to fight cybercrime and botnets and the like but there's got to be a solution that involves due process.
- matheusmoreira 6y agoThanks for the details. > Domain names ought to be property, and like any other property should be protected against arbitrary seizure by courts of law. I completely agree. Some group saying the domain is associated with malware shouldn't be enough to cause it to be seized. They should have to actually prove it in court.