4 ms·
"I'm not talking about orthodox utility theory ("EUT"), and I'm not trying to say that it's currently a good theory, either." The reply button is missing below
by ReflectedImage 6y ago
"I'm not talking about orthodox utility theory ("EUT"), and I'm not trying to say that it's currently a good theory, either."
The reply button is missing below so I'll reply here.
The issue is that the major results of economics in this sort of area are been effectively destroyed by EE. Prospect theory for example is completely gone.
There may be places where people's behaviour isn't rational but research into that needs to be effectively carried out again from scratch. The main "evo psych" results in economists have been effectively disproven.
So you might be right that people don't act rationally but all existing research into that area is currently dead in the water. It's start from square 1 again.
- hntrader 6y ago"research ... dead in the water" There's no need for explicit research to establish the fact that people differ in their subjective preferences (utility) pertaining to outcome distributions. The evidence is abundant. I can go down to the casino and see this. Or I can see that family member A has insurance while family member B doesn't. You talked earlier about wanting a theory to have stable foundations. A theory that doesn't even recognize the existence of subjective expected utility is not that.