If I were a politician, which I am not, I would do this: Gather the experts in the fields (there are likely more than one field at play) and manage their discu

If I were a politician, which I am not, I would do this: Gather the experts in the fields (there are likely more than one field at play) and manage their discussion. I would ask them questions and observe how they discuss. If I felt that one or both were not intellectually honest, I would replace them with other people, and repeat. Once I felt an intellectually honest discussion had reached a conclusion, then I would act (vote, provide legislation, etc). It is sad to me that we are moving away from a process like this and not toward it.