3 ms·
> “Facial coverings are contrary to our value system,” Wobmann told Swiss public television, SRF. He said there were now clear rules in place so that “people kn
by mLuby 6y ago
> “Facial coverings are contrary to our value system,” Wobmann told Swiss public television, SRF. He said there were now clear rules in place so that “people know that in our country, you show your face in public”.
I wonder if this reasoning will be re-examined due to widespread good faith face mask use during the pandemic.
- zaik 6y agoWearing a mask for health reasons is still allowed. That being said, laws prohibiting what you may wear, targeted specifically against a religion, are concerning.
- throwoutttt 6y agoConserning to some, liberating to many
- sjwright 6y agoConcerning to whom? The people who want to impose clothing upon others or the people who have clothing imposed upon them? Or perhaps the people who stand on the sidelines and do nothing when culture is holding a veto over rank, overt misogyny. (And before anyone cries discrimination, this particular subject is entirely geographic-cultural. Somehow we’ve been convinced that culture must have a veto over sexism. I'm unconvinced that we should consider this as settled debate.)