This argument is bent over backwards. A cafeteria serving red meat allows people not eating red meat to not order it. The other way around, not so much. And tha

This argument is bent over backwards. A cafeteria serving red meat allows people not eating red meat to not order it. The other way around, not so much. And thats the problem with all the neo-luddite, super-feminist or anarcho-ecological movements. They all want to curtail choice, which does not sit well with most humans. We as humanity respond well to nudges and a gradual process, but bans, cancelling and aggresive prohibition will always have the same effect.