> once in a while they might get through the review process He talks about a paper that has been "rejected by 14 economics journals, if I've counted correctly,

> once in a while they might get through the review process He talks about a paper that has been "rejected by 14 economics journals, if I've counted correctly, for questioning the ergodic hypothesis." I've not looked at that paper. I don't know how bad it is. But I suspect that "questioning the ergodic hypothesis" may not be the only reason. https://twitter.com/ole_b_peters/status/1294216181159796736 https://twitter.com/ole_b_peters/status/1294216181159796736