3 ms·
What about a triple beam setup? The individual beams would be only half or a third as powerful, making them safer to human eyes. Only where they cross they woul
by markvdb 6y ago
What about a triple beam setup? The individual beams would be only half or a third as powerful, making them safer to human eyes. Only where they cross they would carry enough power to zap the mosquito...
- Kliment 6y agoA 300mW beam is far more than enough to ruin your eyes.
- uuidgen 6y agoThis laser is 200 times too powerful to be considered "mostly safe" for human ayes (cat 3R) and 1000 times too powerful to be considered safe (cat 2). I toyed with the idea but it's hazardous in any usable setup. If you'd like to do it moderately safe I'd stay away from lasers. Use a power LED and parabolic reflector to make the beam as incoherent as possible and then focus it with optics to create very narrow focal depth. Then it will still be able to burn the mosquito but won't be a blinding hazard as little as 20 centimetres from the focal point.
- markvdb 6y agoI must admit I was just thinking out loud, not bothered by any relevant knowledge. Thank you for your thoughtful explanation.
- chrismorgan 6y agoIn Australia a laser that emits more than one milliwatt is a prohibited weapon. Your three 333 mW lasers are still vastly over this legal limit. (And Australia’s laws here were decided based on safety standards, the figures of which uuidgen points out.)