> A camera is cheaper than a car mirror at this point. It'll make the car slightly more aerodynamic. It also requires electronics, a screen, wires and electric

> A camera is cheaper than a car mirror at this point. It'll make the car slightly more aerodynamic. It also requires electronics, a screen, wires and electricity to operate. A rube goldberg contraption that can fail in any number of ways. While my existing boring low tech mirrors just reflects existing photons without any aforementioned nonsense. Just why?