2 ms·
> it is a normal, customary usage to refer to the government of the country by the name of the country. And this is more or less fine. Not just in the news, in
by dvfjsdhgfv 6y ago
> it is a normal, customary usage to refer to the government of the country by the name of the country.
And this is more or less fine. Not just in the news, in normal conversation we do the same. Not just "China is doing this" but also "Chinese are doing this." That's also logically true, because some subset (however big or small) of Chinese is doing this.
However, I object to this particular expression - "China is a hostile nation." I don't know why it's even a point of contention. Maybe when people use the term 'nation' they actually mean 'state'? Because 'nation' by and large refers to people the country consist of.
- AnimalMuppet 6y ago> Maybe when people use the term 'nation' they actually mean 'state'? Yes, they do. > Because 'nation' by and large refers to people the country consist of. No, it doesn't. We keep telling you this, over and over and over, and you keep not listening, but I'm going to say it one more time: No, it doesn't. When you're talking about international things - things between countries - "nation" by and large refers to the government, not the people.