4 ms·
It is free for wikipedia.
by tubularhells 6y ago
It is free for wikipedia.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ClumsyPilot 6y agoTwitter is worth and spends billions but wikipedia should run on fumes? Are people here collectively insane?
- remram 6y agoPeople here hold multiple opinions because there are multiple people here, not because the single mind they share is insane.
- wpietri 6y agoThe content production still isn't free; other people just bear the costs.
- tubularhells 6y agoYes, that's why I said it's free for wikipedia. The editors are not wikipedia, as much as the site would like us to feel. I left editing a decade ago, but spent a lot of time editing Wikipedia during university. It was not worth the time, and I regret not chasing skirts instead.