4 ms·
Since one of the people who's implicitly agreeing is the owner of the tweet and CEO of the platform, I find that gives it a decent amount of credence.
by qqii 6y ago
Since one of the people who's implicitly agreeing is the owner of the tweet and CEO of the platform, I find that gives it a decent amount of credence.
- sp332 6y agoSure but it doesn't automatically change who has control over the tweet, or make this tweet behave any differently from others on the platform.
- qqii 6y agoIt doesn't, but that also not what's valuable here. Take the recent grumpy cat NFT as an example, what's being sold is just an the original grumpy cat image except the NFT creator is verified to be the cat's owner. It doesn't give the purchaser any rights but it still sold for a decent amount. What's valuable is that it was created by the owner, not any rights or control.