To be scrupulouly fair, it's entirly possible to be notorious for something you didn't actually do, and social justice warriors have certainly tried to make tha

To be scrupulouly fair, it's entirly possible to be notorious for something you didn't actually do, and social justice warriors have certainly tried to make that the case for facial recognition's alleged racist bias, to some degree successfully. So the statement you quoted is technically correct[0], at least among certain sufficiently credulous groups. To be less-scrupulouly fair, the rest of the article is actually fairly on point and has little to with the author's susceptibility to memetic disease (yay compartmentalization bias?). 0: The best kind of correct!