3 ms·
> the owner presumably agrees not to autograph again and sell to other people. Just like the existing art world, except now you have more ways to prove proven
by vmception 6y ago
> the owner presumably agrees not to autograph again and sell to other people.
Just like the existing art world, except now you have more ways to prove provenance, and originality. the prior timestamp and your ownership and the price history being onchain.
- Macha 6y agoWhat are the consequences for Jack Dorsey if he does sell it again? At least an artist copying their own painting has to produce a new object.
- qqii 6y agoHe'd have to sell the same tweet on another platform who has an NFT that people interpret as representing tweets. The direct consequences for Jack are none, just as if a company that produced a limited edition stamped #001 of a product decided to manufacture and sell the same product with #001. By using this platform he's indirectly given them his blessing and like the company example even though it would be physically difficult I doubt he'd do.
- vmception 6y agoIts up to the market to discern the difference, which it is pretty good at, but you are relying on them or yourself for sounding the alarm and making a big stink about it