4 ms·
That's actually a counter example to what you're trying to say. In this case you are arguing that Russian law should follow a citizen, where as the US said it
by strictnein 6y ago
That's actually a counter example to what you're trying to say.
In this case you are arguing that Russian law should follow a citizen, where as the US said it shouldn't. So the "precedent" that was set (if in fact there was one set) in a case from 20 years ago in which the case against the accused was dropped, was actually that your laws don't follow you around.
- iso1210 6y agoThe precedent set was that the EU could arrest a citizen of the US for working for a company based in the US if that citizen happened to go to the EU on holiday. The Meng Wanzhou case had the EU being able to extradite a US citizen from the UK for breaking EU law.